Commentary: From Rare Earths to AI, the Quad Faces a Delivery Test

Caixin Global · Deng Youyi Published Nov 6 · 2026-11-06 00:00 UTC

Pledging money for recycling plants and tech access is the easy part, but keeping them operational in a cutthroat global market is the real test

1. [para. 1][para. 2][para. 3] The G20 foreign ministers’ meeting on Oct. 30–31 reportedly failed to produce agreement on geopolitical and economic-security issues. In Atlanta on Oct. 31, the Quad—the United States, Japan, Australia and India—announced more than $85 million in technical and financial assistance to expand “trusted AI” access across the Indo-Pacific. Washington separately pledged $10 million for critical-mineral recycling facilities in India and ASEAN.

2. [para. 4][para. 5] The two commitments serve different purposes: one supports resource recovery, the other technology access. Yet both reflect the same ambition—to broaden supply channels and reduce the risks of excessive concentration. But a funding pledge is not a functioning supply chain; the test will come when projects move from announcements to operation.

3. [para. 7][para. 8][para. 9][para. 10] The mineral and AI initiatives address different supply-chain vulnerabilities. Critical-mineral cooperation aims to expand secondary raw-material sources: according to a 2026 International Energy Agency report, China accounts for about 60% of global mining of magnet rare earths, 90% of refining and 95% of permanent-magnet production. Indian data show China supplied 90.4% of India’s permanent-magnet imports by volume in fiscal 2024–25. Marco Rubio denied that the Quad is anti-China, but China’s supply concentration remains a key motivation.

Read the full story at Caixin Global · All coverage of this story